Zero Trust Access

Reduce Site-to-Site Access

Site-to-site tunnels are often “always-on” and too broad. This use case makes partner and site access targeted: only the required applications/services, with clear rules and traceability. Goal: within 60 days, fewer unnecessary attack surfaces and less risk of lateral movement.

If you’d like, we’ll show you the approach in a short demo, together with our technology partner.

Best for

  • Many tunnels to partners/sites
  • Unclear what they’re still needed for
  • Risk: lateral movement through “flat” connections

Outcome

  • Targeted instead of broad: only required services
  • Less attack surface between networks
  • Better control and traceability

What you get

  • Overview of site-to-site connections (to where, for what)
  • Target picture: which services truly need to cross?
  • Migration plan (pilot → waves)
  • Verification that it continues to work

Brief explanation

Your Challenge

Tunnels are set up and rarely questioned again. Over years, flat connections accumulate that become motorways during an incident.

Our Solution

We make connections “smaller”: defined services, clear rules, controlled migration. Where appropriate, we replace “always-on” with targeted access with clear approvals/time windows. Connectivity remains, but risk drops.
Typical timeframe: 2–4 weeks until pilot.

Flow

1

Collect tunnel inventory + use cases

2

Define target services

3

Plan migration (prioritised)

4

Pilot + rollout in waves

5

Verification + cleanup

Frequently asked questions

Is this a network project?
Yes, but with a security objective: less attack surface, more control.

What’s the quick win?
Identify and shut down unnecessary tunnels – after a detailed check.

Are there operational risks?
With pilot and waves, it’s controllable.

How do you measure success?
Fewer open attack surfaces, less “always-on”, fewer exceptions.

Reduce “motorways” between networks.

Let’s make site-to-site access targeted, without blocking the business.